<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Style Grind &#187; standards</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stylegrind.com/category/standards/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stylegrind.com</link>
	<description>Daily CSS, Internet Tech, Web 2.0 and AJAX News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 03:27:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Compound Microformats</title>
		<link>http://stylegrind.com/css/compound-microformats/</link>
		<comments>http://stylegrind.com/css/compound-microformats/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 02:43:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CSS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stylegrind.com/css/compound-microformats/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A great demo page showing off Compound Microformats, if your wondering how to implement Microformats into your site, this is a good starting place.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://premasagar.com/microformats/compound/">A great demo page showing off Compound Microformats</a>, if your wondering how to implement Microformats into your site, this is a good starting place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://stylegrind.com/css/compound-microformats/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Big Picture on Microformats</title>
		<link>http://stylegrind.com/standards/the-big-picture-on-microformats/</link>
		<comments>http://stylegrind.com/standards/the-big-picture-on-microformats/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2006 02:42:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stylegrind.com/the-big-picture-on-microformats/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Most web developers who read magazines such as Digital Web will be familiar with the term microformats, and might even have played around with hCards or tags. In fact, way back in November 2005, Digital Web was among the first to address this subject, publishing a great introduction by Garrett Dimon.
Few really dispute the potential [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most web developers who read magazines such as Digital Web will be familiar with the term microformats, and might even have played around with hCards or tags. In fact, way back in November 2005, Digital Web was among the first to address this subject, publishing a great introduction by Garrett Dimon.</p>
<p>Few really dispute the potential of microformats, but all technologies, no matter their promise, live and die by their adoption. So, how are microformats faring a year or so after their coming-out party? Since microformats are markup, their impact is less obvious than, say, AJAX—whose dynamic visual effects are usually a bit of a giveaway. It may come as a surprise, then, that the level of adoption by tool developers, publishers, and aggregators is significant, and that you probably visit sites with microformatted content all the time, without even knowing it. <a href="http://www.digital-web.com/articles/the_big_picture_on_microformats/">In this article, we’ll review what people are doing with microformats right now</a>, and finish up by looking at a couple of cool projects that might whet your appetite for microformats’ future prospects.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://stylegrind.com/standards/the-big-picture-on-microformats/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>To Hell with WCAG 2</title>
		<link>http://stylegrind.com/standards/to-hell-with-wcag-2/</link>
		<comments>http://stylegrind.com/standards/to-hell-with-wcag-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2006 00:46:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stylegrind.com/to-hell-with-wcag-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A List Apart&#8217;s latest article is about the W3C&#8217;s Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) first update since 1999.
&#8220;The proposed new WCAG 2.0 is the  result of five long years’ work by a Web Accessibility Initiative  (WAI) committee that never quite got  its act together. In an effort to be all things to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A List Apart&#8217;s latest article is about the <a href="http://www.alistapart.com/articles/tohellwithwcag2">W3C&#8217;s Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) first update since 1999</a>.</p>
<p>&#8220;The proposed new <acronym><span class="caps">WCAG</span></acronym> 2.0 is the  result of five long years’ work by a Web Accessibility Initiative  (<acronym><span class="caps">WAI</span></acronym>) committee that never quite got  its act together. In an effort to be all things to all web content, the  fundamentals of <span class="caps">WCAG 2</span> are nearly impossible for a  working standards-compliant developer to understand. <span class="caps">WCAG  2</span> backtracks on basics of responsible web development that are well  accepted by standardistas.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://stylegrind.com/standards/to-hell-with-wcag-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
